Astronomical Toolkit
Magnitudes: a concept first developed
in 120 BC
 |
Figure 1: Hipparchus of Nicaea (c.190 –
c.120 BC) at work
Hipparchus, a Greek astronomer, invented
the first scale to rate the brightness of the
stars. |
When we look at the sky on a clear night we
see stars. Some appear bright and others very
faint as seen from Earth.
Some of the faint stars
are intrinsically very bright, but are very
distant. Some of the brightest stars in the sky
are very faint stars that just happen to lie very
close to us. When observing, we are forced to
stay on Earth or nearby and can only measure
the intensity of the light that reaches us.
Unfortunately this does not immediately tell us
anything about a star’s internal properties. If we
want to know more about a star, its size or
physical/internal brightness, for example, we
need to know its distance from Earth.
Historically, the stars visible to the naked eye
were put into six different brightness classes,
called magnitudes. This system was originally
devised by the Greek astronomer Hipparchus
about 120 BC and is still in use today in a
slightly revised form. Hipparchus chose to categorise
the brightest stars as magnitude 1, and
the faintest as magnitude 6.
Astronomy has changed a lot since Hipparchus
lived! Instead of using only the naked eye, light
is now collected by large mirrors in either
ground-based telescopes such as the VLT in the
Atacama Desert in Chile or the Hubble Space
Telescope above the Earth’s atmosphere.
The collected light is then analysed by instruments
able to detect objects billions of times fainter
than any human eye can see.
However, even today astronomers still use a
slightly revised form of Hipparchus’ magnitude
scheme called apparent magnitudes. The modern
definition of magnitudes was chosen so that
the magnitude measurements already in use did
not have to be changed.
Astronomers use two different types of
magnitudes: apparent magnitudes and absolute
magnitudes.
Apparent magnitude
The apparent magnitude, m, of a star is a measure
of how bright a star appears as observed on
or near Earth.
Instead of defining the apparent magnitude
from the number of light photons we observe,
it is defined relative to the magnitude and
intensity of a reference star. This means that an
astronomer can measure the magnitudes of stars
by comparing the measurements with some
standard stars that have already been measured
in an absolute (as opposed to relative) way.
The apparent magnitude, m, is given by:
m = mref – 2.5 log (I/Iref)
where mref is the apparent magnitude of the
reference star, I is the measured intensity of the
light from the star, and Iref is the intensity of
the light from the reference star. The scale factor
2.5 brings the modern definition into line
with the older, more subjective apparent magnitudes.
It is interesting to note that the scale that
Hipparchus selected on an intuitive basis, using
just the naked eye, is already logarithmic as a
result of the way our eyes respond to light.
For comparison, the apparent magnitude of the
full Moon is about –12.7, the magnitude of
Venus can be as high as –4 and the Sun has a
magnitude of about –26.5.
Absolute magnitude
We now have a proper definition for the
apparent magnitude. It is a useful tool for
astronomers, but does not tell us anything
about the intrinsic properties of a star. We need
to establish a common property that we can use
to compare different stars and use in statistical
analysis. This property is the absolute
magnitude.
The absolute magnitude, M, of a star is defined
as the relative magnitude a star would have if it
were placed 10 parsecs (read about parsecs in
the Mathematical Toolkit if needed) from the Sun.
Since only a very few stars are exactly 10 parsecs
away, we can use an equation that will allow us
to calculate the absolute magnitude for stars at
different distances: the distance equation. The
equation naturally also works the other way –
given the absolute magnitude the distance can
be calculated.
Different colours, different magnitudes
Figure 2: Temperature and colour of stars
This schematic diagram shows the relationship between the colour of a star and its surface temperature. Intensity is plotted
against wavelength for two hypothetical stars. The visible part of the spectrum is indicated. The star’s colour is determined by
where in the visible part of the spectrum, the peak of the intensity curve lies. |
 |
 |
By the late 19th century, when astronomers
were using photographs to record the sky and to
measure the apparent magnitudes of stars, a
new problem arose. Some stars that appeared to
have the same brightness when observed with
the naked eye appeared to have different
brightnesses on film, and vice versa. Compared
to the eye, the photographic emulsions used
were more sensitive to blue light and less so to
red light.
Accordingly, two separate scales were devised:
visual magnitude, or mvis, describing how a star
looked to the eye and photographic magnitude,
or mphot, referring to measurements made with
blue-sensitive black-and-white film. These are
now abbreviated to mv and mp.
However, different types of photographic emulsions
differ in their sensitivity to different
colours. And people’s eyes differ too! Magnitude
systems designed for different wavelength
ranges had to be more firmly calibrated.
Today, precise magnitudes are specified by
measurements from a standard photoelectric
photometer through standard colour filters.
Several photometric systems have been devised;
the most familiar is called UBV after the three
filters most commonly used. The U filter lets
mostly near-ultraviolet light through, B mainly
blue light, and V corresponds fairly closely to
the old visual magnitude; its wide peak is in the
yellow-green band, where the eye is most sensitive.
The corresponding magnitudes in this system
are called mU, mB and mV.
From B-V colour index to temperature
Figure 3: Surface temperature versus B-V colour index
This diagram shows the relation between the surface temperature of a star, T, and its B-V colour index. Knowing either the surface
temperature or the B-V colour index you can find the other value from this diagram.
|
 |
The term B-V colour index (nicknamed B-V by astronomers)
is defined as the difference in the
two magnitudes, mB-mV (as measured in the
UBV system). A pure white star has a B-V colour
index of about 0.2, our yellow Sun of 0.63, the
orange-red Betelgeuse of 1.85 and the bluest
star possible is believed to have a B-V colour
index of –0.4. One way of thinking about colour
index is that the bluer a star is, the more negative
its B magnitude and therefore the lower the
difference mB-mV will be.
There is a clear relation between the surface
temperature T of a star and its B-V colour index
(see Reed, C., 1998, Journal of the Royal
Society of Canada, 92, 36–37) so we can find
the surface temperature of the star by using a
diagram of T versus mB–mV(see Fig. 3).
log10(T) = (14.551 - (mB - mV) )/ 3.684
The distance equation
 |
Figure 4: The ESA HIPPARCOS satellite
The HIPPARCOS satellite was launched on
the night of 8 August 1989 by a European
Ariane 4 launcher. The principal objective of
ESA's HIPPARCOS mission was the
production of a star catalogue of unprecedented
precision. The positions and the
distances of a set of about 120,000 preselected
stars with magnitudes down to B =
13 were determined with high accuracy. The
HIPPARCOS mission ended in 1993 and the
final star catalogue was published in 1997. |
The distance equation is written as:
m-M = 5 log (D/10 pc) = 5 log(D) – 5
This equation establishes the connection
between the apparent magnitude, m, the
absolute magnitude, M, and the distance, D,
measured in parsec. The value m-M is known as
the distance modulus and can be used to determine
the distance to an object.
A little algebra will transform this equation
to an equivalent form that is sometimes
more convenient (feel free to test this yourselves):
D = 10(m-M+5)/5
When determining distances to objects in the
Universe we measure the apparent magnitude m
first. Then, if we also know the intrinsic brightness
of an object (its absolute magnitude M),
we can calculate its distance D. Much of the
hardest work in finding astronomical distances is
concerned with
determining the absolute magnitudes
of certain types of astronomical objects.
Absolute magnitudes have for instance been
measured by ESA’s HIPPARCOS satellite. HIPPARCOS
is a satellite that, among many other things,
measured accurate distances and apparent magnitudes
of a large number of nearby stars.
Luminosity and Intensity
Up to now we have been talking about stellar
magnitudes, but we have never mentioned how
much light energy is really emitted by the star.
The total energy emitted as light by the star
each second is called its luminosity, L, and is
measured in watts (W). It is equivalent to the
power emitted.
Luminosity and magnitudes are related. A remote
star with a high luminosity can have the
same apparent magnitude as a nearby star with
a low luminosity. Knowing the apparent magnitude
and the distance of a star, we are able to
The star radiates light in all directions so that
its emission is spread over a sphere. To find the
intensity, I, of light from a star at the Earth
(the intensity is the emission per unit area), we
divide its luminosity by the area of a sphere,
with the star at the centre and radius equal to
the distance of the star from Earth, D. See
Fig. 5.
I = L/(4 pi D2)
The luminosity of a star can also be measured as
a multiple of the Sun’s luminosity, Lsun =
3.85 × 1026 W. As the Sun is ‘our’ star and the
best-known star, it is nearly always taken as the
reference star.
Using some algebra we find the formula for calculating
the luminosity, L, of a star relative to
the Sun’s luminosity:
L/Lsun = (D/Dsun)2·I/Isun
The ratio I/Isun can be determined using the formula
given in the Apparent Magnitudes section
of the Astronomical Toolkit (msun = –26.5).
 |
Figure 5: Intensity of light
This drawing shows how the same amount of radiation from a light source must illuminate an ever-increasing area as distance
from the light source increases. The area increases as the square of the distance from the source, so the intensity decreases as
the square of the distance increases. |
|